|
By Thea Jarvis
The Cuban detainees in the United States Penitentiary in Atlanta,
some of whom have refused food to highlight feelings of futility and
frustration, are men caught in the middle.
Flanking them on either side is a Reagan administration still
involved in defining policy with respect to the over 1,700 Cubans held at the
Big A and a prison authority which must adhere to federal
guidelines regarding such detainees. Joining the Cubans somewhere near the
center of the triad is the United States Catholic Conference which, despite
odds, is attempting to aid in the processing of the Cubans, now one year into
confinement.
About 125,000 Cubans entered the United States during the
Freedom Flotilla a year ago. Although most have been released into
American society, the Atlanta Penitentiary still lays claim to 1,763 men, over
1,400 of whom have been ordered out of the States because of criminal acts
committed in Cuba.
Prior to February of this year, ongoing processing of the Cubans,
though slow and tedious, had resulted in the release of slightly under 100 of
the detainees. But a federal order issued last week has tentatively halted
further release.
Manuel De la Torre Rodriguez, the Cuban inmate who ended a hunger
strike May 22 after 21 days without food, received assurances from Atlanta
Penitentiary warden Jack Hanberry that help would be sought in the seemingly
dead-end dilemma.
In Cuba, where his family still resides, De la Torre was in the
army and gave away a truckload of food to some of his hungry countrymen. This
was one of the reasons for De la Torres imprisonment in a Cuban jail,
according to Tom Stavran, program coordinator for the United States Catholic
Conference assigned to Atlanta.
Stavran describes De la Torre as very determined, very
sincere, and not off in the clouds about his commitment to seeking
freedom. He stated that De la Torre was recently contacted by a prospective
sponsor in Miami who came to the prison and was impressed by him and what
hes trying to do. Federal regulations, however, prohibit
resettlement for the detainees in the Florida area because of the already large
influx of Cuban refugees there.
Another Cuban inmate who opted to join the hunger strike was Mario
Solano Vasquez, author of the freedom of flowers slogan
liberation or death.
In a letter to Martha and Tomas Antona, Our Lady of Assumption
parishioners who have worked unstintingly on behalf of the Cubans, Solano
announced his decision to draw attention to the plight of the detainees.
Martha Antona described Solano as a plantado, a Cuban
who opted to fight the Castro-imposed communism rather than betray allegiance
to his homeland. He spent 11 years in Cuban prisons clad only in underwear
he refused to wear prison garb.
According to the Antonas, the Cuban population in the Atlanta
Penitentiary includes political prisoners who opposed Castros communist
rule, as well as mentally disturbed individuals who shouldnt be
there. Some Cubans who have already been released to sponsors were freed
because their crimes in Cuba had only been minor offenses, Tomas
Antona explained.
A spokesman for the USCC in Atlanta has indicated that his
organization will proceed under the assumption that all the Cuban detainees
will be released.
The legal ambiguities of the Cuban problem abound. The status of
the detainees alone is a complicated issue. According to Bill Noonan, spokesman
for the United States Penitentiary in Atlanta, the Cubans are not refugees but
entrants who have had exclusion hearings. Under normal conditions,
they would be deported to their country of origin. Cuban, however, refuses to
accept them.
Were at an impasse, said Noonan. People
get stuck in between these things.
Federal policy on the Cubans is still in the process of
formulation. Most recently, the United States Attorney General put a hold on
the release of any more Cubans from the Atlanta Penitentiary until the Reagan
administration comprehensively defines its position.
Any decision with regard to the Cubans must be made on the
national level, said Tyrus E. Minnix, District Director of the United
States Immigration and Naturalization Services in Atlanta. The Department
of State is in diplomatic negotiations with the Cuban government and has been
for a considerable length of time. At this time we have no way of knowing what
the outcome will be.
Meanwhile, said Minnix, exclusion hearings are still being
accorded, but the review of individual cases a later stage in processing
has been suspended.
USCCs Tom Stavran, who has been directly involved in
processing the Cubans, questions their legal status. What laws do they
come under? Are they to be treated as regular prisoners? The law is ambiguous
everybody is treading new waters here.
Martha Antona, faced with the breakdown in federal machinery
regarding the Cubans, left her job with the USCC about four weeks ago out of
sheer frustration.
I realized nothing was going to change. My boss came back
(from Washington) with bad news we had to slow down everything. We would
get no more helpers, she said. Its so sad.
Her husband, Tomas, who serves as president of the Atlanta
Committee on Behalf of Cuban Prisoners, feels that deportation to Cuba should
be a matter of choice left to the individuals, who can then prove their
determination to make a success of life in the States.
Some who had been refused entry in the States continued to be
unwelcome in their homeland.
Those who were sent back were tied up (by Cuban officials),
put on boats and set out to seas, Antona said.
Prior to February of this year, immigration authorities would
check Atlanta cases and give them to the USCC for processing. The USCC in turn
would forward individual cases to Immigration and Naturalization Services
headquarters in Washington, according to Antona.
But last February, INS authorities decided to move their Cuban
operation from Washington to Atlanta to expedite processing. The Washington
machinery was indeed halted, but was never resumed on-site in Atlanta, Thomas
Antona said. Since there is now no feudal authority to approve Cubans for
release, they must remain incarcerated until the federal arm of the processing
system is again begun.
Last week, 10 of the men who were approved by INS prior to the
February cutoff were not permitted to leave the penitentiary in Atlanta.
Weve been trying to do whatever we can to help,
said Antona. Were now trying to get government attention. There is
no action, even for those ready to leave. These men have reached a point where
they have tried every legal way, every possible way to get out. At this point,
they are desperate.
While nations roar and bureaucrats rumble, life inside the Atlanta
Penitentiary goes on despite a moratorium on the release of the Cubans.
Weve got a job to perform, said penitentiary spokesman Bill
Noonan. As far as possible, theyre being treated like federal
inmates, although theyre really pre-trial inmates awaiting disposition.
Our official position is that were going to have to hold them as long as
we are required.
Being treated like federal inmates means that any Cubans who
choose to go on hunger strike will not be allowed to fast until death, like IRA
protesters in British prisons. Federal regulations are clear on this point,
according to Noonan. Any steps necessary to keep an inmate alive will be
undertaken.
On the brighter side, prison activities for the Cubans are
ongoing. We still try to have programs and classes for the inmates. For
example, 750 of the men are working at the institution to earn money,
Noonan said.
The USCC, whose hands are tied as far as actual release of the
prisoners is concerned, likewise has a job to do in the interim.
We are doing administrative work, planning personnel needs,
getting papers in order, expanding the operation. We are still trying to get
sponsors verified by the archdiocese, Tom Stavran said.
But Martha Antona, who daily hears the grief in the voices of
Cuban inmates and their families who call her home to share their frustration,
views the situation with frank dismay.
Its a hot ball and theyre playing around with
it, she said. |