|
Six Southern Bishops, including Archbishop
Thomas A. Donnellan of Atlanta, have issued a statement on the subject of the
union-management dispute of the J. P. Stevens Company plants in the
Southeastern United States. The statement is as follows:
It has now been ten months since the Catholic
bishops of the Province of Atlanta and the Diocese of Richmond issued a public
statement concerning the labor-management dispute at the J. P. Stevens Co.,
Inc. At that time, we made clear our concern for the problems of the working
man and woman and the economic health of the community. We reemphasize here
that our interest in the economic welfare of the community finds its source in
long-standing religious teaching on social justice and the rights of workers to
organize and to have a just share in the rewards of their labors. We are
conscious that there are those who wish that the church, and churchmen, would
"stay in the pulpit," but we insist that the implications of the gospel itself
force us to become involved in issues of justice and the basic rights of
working people.
In the light of this concern, since our last
statement we have met at some length with representatives of both labor and
management in order to express our continued willingness to assist in
reconciling the differences that too long have separated them. In both cases
our meetings were cordial and candid, allowing for an exchange of views and an
expression of positions leading to the current impasse. In reflecting on these
meetings, we feel we should make public our present assessment of the J. P.
Stevens dispute.
We are encouraged by certain advances made by J.
P. Stevens management, which have resulted in some improvements for the
workers. These changes have, however, been minimal and they cannot disguise the
strong, and acknowledged, anti-union philosophy of the company. As long as this
attitude on the part of management continues, it constitutes a serious obstacle
to the realistic resolution of the Stevens dispute. The company's anti-union
position radiates a climate of disapproval, which cannot fail to discourage
workers from joining unions, and it makes every union advance a struggle
between opposing forces. We feel that this is an area for basic change if
progress is to be made, and we call upon J. P. Stevens Co. to reassess its
position and at least, remain neutral in the process of union decisions by the
workers.
Moreover, the evidence is overwhelming that, in
practice as well as in theory, the J. P. Stevens Co. has followed a path of
discouragement, and even repression, of union activity. That policy is
reminiscent of an earlier management-labor stance which has, for the most part,
happily disappeared from the American scene. The National Labor Relations
Board, on many occasions, and indeed the federal courts have used strong and
denunciatory language in reviewing the recalcitrant Stevens' behavior and made
headlines across the country. In the light of this, any fair-minded observer is
forced to acknowledge that the blame for the present social crisis lies heavily
upon the company.
The long delays in the pursuit of justice,
extended by many court appeals, have not contributed to any public confidence
in the willingness of J. P. Stevens to adopt reasonable solutions. These delays
have taxed the patience of the workers and scandalized the public so much as to
suggest that new national legislation must be passed to make such dilatory
efforts impossible in the future.
In short, we find a sad record of continued
opposition to the formation of unions, in philosophy and in action, by the J.
P. Stevens Co., and we find it to be irreconcilable with the clear demands of
social justice in the Christian Gospel. This evaluation of the record does not
in any way constitute an endorsement of irresponsible activity or conduct on
the part of union representatives. We acknowledge that the record of the union
activists has had its rough spots, especially in the early attempts at
organization.
At this time, as leaders in the Catholic
community, we appeal again to the J. P. Stevens Co. to rearrange its priorities
and make social justice and the needs of the worker a matter of its primary
concern. We, as Bishops of the Southeast, continue to hope that a turnabout is
possible and a new path to the future attainable. The recent Supreme Court
decision declining a review of the J. P. Stevens case may provide the occasion
for a more enlightened approach by the company to its pressing problems.
We reserve the right, and indeed accept the
obligation, of further review if some change in the present situation does not
soon eventuate. At the same time, if our efforts can in some manner promote the
course of social justice for all, we put ourselves once again at the service of
both parties involved in the dispute.
Most Reverend Thomas A. Donnellan, Archbishop of
Atlanta, Georgia
Most Reverend Michael J. Begley, Bishop of
Charlotte, North Carolina
Most Reverend F. Joseph Gossman, Bishop of
Raleigh, North Carolina
Most Reverend Walter F. Sullivan, Bishop of
Richmond, Virginia
Most Reverend Ernest L. Unterkoefler, Bishop of
Charleston, South Carolina
|