|
By Mary Lackie
There is a climate of urgency about sex education today because
young people are living in the now age when the subject is
constantly before them, said Mrs. Helen F. Southard, psychologist and author.
Sex Education: Whose Responsibility? was the topic of
Mrs. Southards keynote address at the conference for adult workers for
youth sponsored by the YWCA last Friday.
Mrs. Southard said, Twenty years ago sex education was
thought of as reproductive education that parents gave children at a particular
moment and things were fine. You had told your children the facts of
life.
She said, Today I feel there is an urgency about sex
education. The subject is so constantly before young people that they become
confused about what they should or should not do. Sex has become the big
sell and part of the big sell is the romance connected with it.
Another problem faced by young people is the pressure exerted on
them by parents and by society. There is pressure from parents to begin
dating at an early age, to get into college, even into kindergarten. Social
pressures with emphasis on experimentation and the uncertainties about the
future give young people the feeling that if there is anything that is
going to make me happy, lets have it now, Mrs. Southard said.
Mrs. Southard said, Those of the Judeo-Christian tradition
want to develop young people who will have a concern for others. Weve got
to raise young people who can break out of the unwholesome bonds of dependency,
learn to share, and not grow up with the idea, what can I get out of
life?
This training will require broader educational experiences. Mrs.
Southard said, We have compartmentalized sex education. Young people can
ask any question they want, but they should not ask about sex. This violates
one of the basic principles of education. I am not in favor of sex education
being given just in times of crisis. And, I dont think the information
causes children to experiment. They are more likely to experiment if they
dont get the information. They should be given the truth all the
time.
She said, Who said this subject doesnt belong in the
home? The quality of the relationship between the mother and father that the
child sees in the home is part of their sex education.
The subject of sex education should be woven into the school
curriculum because so many questions need specialized training for the answers,
Mrs. Southard said. She added that there are many courses, workshops and
seminars available to train teachers for this work.
Young people are searching for answers to what is right and what
is wrong, but most young people receive sex information from their friends.
Only 25 per cent receive their information at home. So, sex education becomes a
role of the churches, but not their only role, the speaker said.
As the child approaches adolescence, he or she is reluctant to
discuss the subject with parents and there should be somebody they could talk
to in their lives. Mrs. Southard urged parents, teachers and church leaders to
involve the community on all economic levels in sex education programs that
meet the particular needs of their areas.
In the response panel that followed, John Y. Powell, director,
Hillside Cottages said, How can we use our social agencies here in
Atlanta to help parents with their daughters an sons? Social agencies should
not take over, but we need new methods of reaching families. Mrs. Kay
Crouch, counselor at Georgia State College, noted that students are often
confused about the male and female role. Mrs. Southard replied that we
are living in a time of rapid change and mixed roles. Role confusion is a
serious matter and can be seen, for example, in the clothing young people
wear.
Dr. Lamar H. Waters, internist and member of the Dekalb County
Medical Association, said that the medical role is not just a matter of
explaining physical and medical changes. Doctors need to move into the area of
family counseling, he commented.
Mrs. L.W. Millican, director of Christian Education, Peachtree
Road Methodist Church, said, We are such a people of extremes that in
order to correct the mistakes of the past, we have limited emphasis to sex
education. As a result, many young people see sex as an end in itself. We
should talk about what makes a strong family life.
The Church, because it can reach young people in a very
personal way, is in an unique position to find out what they know and need to
know. In our haste to bring things out in the open, we have jumped over a whole
area - how can young people show affection for each other in a good
relationship?
What has mental health to do with sex education? asked
Dr. Donald F. Spille, director of the Metropolitan Atlanta Mental Health
Association. He said, Mental health has to do with how people think of
themselves and get along with others. We might be gifted with fertility, but
when it comes to the meaning of life itself, none of us has this inborn
knowledge of how to care and nurture. We need to realize that all
our ideas and feelings are acquired and they originate in the home. Most of
what we learn is not formal. It comes from the models of our parent figures.
This is the challenge in working with children from broken families. We serve
as models and our ideas form childrens ideas. All this initial experience
comes from parental figures.
He said that the schools are beginning to consider their
responsibility in sex education, but added that since sex is so much an
intra-personal relationship, the biology or physical education teacher may be
no more equipped to handle this whole dimension.
Dr. Spille emphasized the role of the clergy in dealing with
families. He said, The clergy meet with 42 per cent of all troubled
people. If we realize this tremendous resource in the community, here is a
challenge to educate our clergy in counseling behavior. Theology is one thing;
counseling is another area.
Father Matthew Robbins, assistant pastor at Immaculate Heart of
Mary parish, described a series of sex education training courses and courses
for parents and children at the church. He said, Sex education is a
life-time process. It is not something that should be taught just at the time
of marriage.
We should put sex into a positive aspect and we see it as
growing. The children can teach their parents by their searching, and the
parents can teach their children by their learning. The Church must meet this
responsibility by listening to parents and children, and by a deep concern with
the questions of morality. As we grow, we need counseling after marriage, and
we need training.
|