|
Archbishop Paul J. Hallinan, chairman of the U.S. Bishops
Committee on the Liturgy, has called on the 7,000-member Liturgical Conference
to come up with concrete proposals for liturgical reform in the United States.
The archbishops appeal came in response to a Liturgical
Conference letter circulated among the nations bishops and criticizing
them for their lack of leadership in liturgical renewal.
The Liturgical Conference statement emphasized serious
distress at the continuing absence of significantly open, creative, and
vigorous leadership in matters liturgical on the part of the National
Conference of Catholic Bishops.
Especially criticizing the discussions of the liturgy carried on
at the bishops meeting in Washington, D.C., last November, the statement
then warned of the possibility of liturgical disobedience. With obvious
reference to underground Masses and agapes being
celebrated around the nation, the statements authors predicted:
There will continue to be an increase in the disregard in
which the liturgical authority of the bishops is being met throughout the
nation by sincere and dedicated people, both clergy and lay.
Archbishop Hallinans reply, while confirming the Liturgical
Conferences complaint, criticized the conference for concentrating on the
bishops. By speaking of the absence of leadership and creativity in the
liturgy, the Liturgical Conference has put its finger on a genuine problem. But
it has merely aggravated the problem by criticizing the bishops alone.
The fact is, the archbishop pointed out, that no
one of us -- bishops, priest, laity, the Liturgical Conference itself -- has
done as much as we could and should have done in matters liturgical. The
responsibility is a shared one.
Last October, Archbishop Hallinan continued, the
Liturgical Conference called for a sense of collaboration and a
willingness to consult in an open dialogue of bishops and priests and the whole
body of lay men and women; and a generous spirit which will show appreciation
for any effort at liturgical renewal...
In that spirit I invite the Liturgical Conference to prepare
and propose to the bishops concrete programs of liturgical reform while
continuing to seek its avowed goals in the fields of liturgical catechumenate
and participation.
Archbishop Hallinan did not respond to a criticism leveled by the
Liturgical Conference at the Vaticans Consilium for the Implementation of
the (Second Vaticans Council) Construction on the Sacred Liturgy. This
criticism indicated that:
The board of directors of the Liturgical Conference can only
observe, and this most urgently, that the quality -- pastoral, structural, and
linguistic -- of the Consiliums liturgical products received in this
country for testing purposes is less than adequate to contemporary needs; and
that these products are quantitatively too little and chronologically too
late.
The statement of the Liturgical Conferences board of
directors collective conscience was made at its midwinter meeting
in Washington, D.C. The conference is a national organization founded in 1940
and dedicated to the work of continuing education in the liturgical field.
|