|
In the 1950s, an audience of nuns had to listen politely as
ecclesiastical speakers addressed them as venerable Sisters. They
squirmed and sometimes muttered under their breath, but their public response
was the sisters staple commodity- they smiled.
If the speaker had even used a dictionary, he would have learned
that venerable meant capable of being venerated, generally implying an
advance age-Ouch! And in the categories of saints, venerable is applied
to these who have attained the lowest of the three degrees of
sanctity. Lowest? Indeed!
The Pious Cliché
Venerable is on its way out, but its substitute is the smug and
patronizing cliché, The good sisters. Arent there good
laymen, good priest, good bishops? Father Leo Trese spotted this as early as
1950:
One of the priesthoods baffling mysteries is how we
dare to patronize these women whose sanctity, whose zeal and ability, often
exceeds our own. Our facetious references to the good nuns or to
Mother Abbess may inflate our ego, but there must be wincing in
Heaven at the ingratitude of priestly ears. If there were table-talking among
the saints, surely a high-ranking topic would be: How do priests get that
way?
Key is Fidelity
Sisters are human too. They may get angry, or jealous or
dissatisfied. But they so often rise above these traits of weakness that there
must be a cause. I think its fidelity, loyalty and the continuity of a
life given to God and consecrated by Him for special tasks.
These are not popular goals today. Much higher on the list are
freedom, self-expression, and self-fulfillment. The good solid terms that are
part of the new conciliar age (involvement, commitment, the right of
conscience) are truly Christian imperatives, but when they stress self and its
identity outcome. The involved person needs most of all the core of fidelity-to
the Church in the world and the religious community. And the most conscientious
adherence to ones commitment, whatever it is, demands a loyalty to the
form of life I have freely chosen and God has most generously blessed.
Of todays tensions, how many rise in the needs of society
and the Church, and how many arise in selfmy way, my will, my talents?
More Than A Spokesman
Last year, Paul VI took up the subject of sisters that Vatican II
had outlined briefly. He told the sisters why the Church loved them: for their
faithfulness to Christ and fidelity to the gospel spirit, the service that
religious communities give to mankind in hundreds of ways. But he emphasized
this: The Church loves you for your vivid, living example
If there
is still so much good in the world, it is because there are those who look up
to you, though they may not let you know, and who draw from your example the
strength to remain faithful.
Our sisters are teaching, nursing, supervising, doing social work
in the slums, directing catechetically our schools of religion, praying in
contemplation, easing the agony of incurable cancer victims. But a sister, any
sister, just walking down the street in Georgia is more than a spokesman for
the Church. She is a sermon, the voice, the act of God in person.
Recently a perceptive Catholic columnist, John Cogley, did one of
his best essays: Generation Gap hits the Convent. With profound
understanding, he discusses the older and younger
sister (but he adds that is really not the point). The convents know this
tension. It would help the laity to understand if they could grasp it. The
decline in vocations, the leaving of sisters, the discontent in some of their
lives are not evils. They are the elements of a situation that can
either slow down our pilgrimage with Christ, or (if our trust in God is
dynamic) can purify and refine the convent ideal, holding faithfully to this
special dedication yet stripping the past of what is useless; meeting
todays needs but as religious women, not as their secular counterparts.
Dont Crush The One
Cogley sees the older group needing the sense of security that the
traditional life gave. He sees on the other hand, the moderns and
their youthful background, their freedom and their revolutionary idea of a
vacation. The future, of course, belongs to the young
if convents
are to survive at all, they will have to do so in terms that make sense to the
contemporary generation.
But we owe the good sisters of old (even thought we
change the title) the hope that they will live their days happily. And the
young ones (and we too) should do everything we can to help and understand
them. Any institution that kicks the heads of those on whose shoulders it is
standing is doomed. And change should merge the old and the new, not crush the
one and exalt the other.
Our Own Senate
Our Sisters Senate, established by the Synod, is now in
action. Last Saturday, nearly 150 attended a day of recollection at Conyers.
They invited me to hear confessions, offer Mass with them and give two
conferences, on the FIRST STEP (Prayer) and the ROAD (Religious Vocation). It
was a privilege to be with them.
Our Senate might well take to heart Bishop Lawrence Caseys
words to the Paterson Sisters Senate last Sunday. In closely reasoned
talk, this outstanding bishop made these points: It will be your Council.
You are mature, dynamic religious women, fully capable of running your own
show.
You are mature women, and you have a right to speak up
without any fear of reprisals or recriminations.
Our own Senate and your bishops join in a loud Amen.
Paul J. Hallinan
Archbishop Of Atlanta |