|
Archbishop Paul J. Hallinan told the Liturgical Conference at
Kansas City last week that it is time to create in the liturgy
before unrest withers into alienation.
The text of the archbishops statement follows:
It is time to create in the liturgy. The time to recover the
past must go on, the true restoration of our full liturgical heritage must
continue. But parallel to it, the Church should listen to and speak to
contemporary man in the accents of a new, creative open spontaneity.
Let us together, priests, laity and bishops move up to the
present, this to create. It cannot be deferred for 20 years, or 10 or 5 or 1.
It must begin at once, or the unrest will wither into alienation.
No competent liturgist wants to descaralize the ways and
worlds of our worship. Neither can he isolate it from life. There are no
officially sacred words or rites. The danger today is that the conscious action
of the community will be absorbed or even crushed by the heavy secularity or
current life.
Liturgy leaders, especially bishops, cannot spend time curbing and
repressing. Although sometimes authority is necessary, our role of leading is
far more vital.
We must listen. Unless we hear the anonymous sounds of
todays unrest, the hopes, the frustrations, the anger of our society, we
will not have the authentic voice of the world or the Church in our ears. We
must be turned to 1967, not to 323 A.D.
We must move, increasing our sensitivity to the urgency of
new works and actions, new moods and approaches. Then, we must move through
those ready and willing to share this urgency with usyoung priests,
religious and laity, Newman and other university personnel, high school
students. Diocesan commissions must reflect not just the bishop; they must
reflect the people in the pews, in the market place and the United Nations.
Finally, we must lead, it is our task to take initiative, to
open up our priests and people the rich opportunities of the present, and to
push forward on every front for the flexibility so ardently called for in the
Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy.
Experimentation is a two way street. Rome to Jonesville is a
route already in good use (concelebrations, new funeral rite, etc.). But we
must attend to the other routeJonesville to Romespontaneous and
well-prepared proposals coming from priests and people through our bishops.
Could we not also extend these grass roots experiments
to a few highly qualified centers like our universities and even to local
diocese or parishes where the local bishop would authorize the proposal, the
controlled experiment, the testing and reporting to the Holy See?
|