|
The school year, 1966-67, was marked by the June closing of two
archdiocesan schools, and the announced closing, two years from this June, of
DYouville Academy, a private Catholic school. The general uneasiness
caused by the closings helped increase a feeling of pessimism among some of the
faithful that was characteristic of the national mood. Changes, sudden and
undeniable, have caused severe tensions and grave doubts about the future of
Catholic education.
Closer examination of the situation in the archdiocese shows that
such pessimism is not completely warranted. The closing of Immaculate
Conception School was not the decision of the archdiocese, but an action forced
by the City of Atlantas desire to use the land for a renewal project.
The closing of Drexel High School, although regrettable, will
actually strengthen the overall high school program. The move was a
consolidation effort. It will have the effect of closing one school, Drexel,
that had always operated far below its capacity enrollment, and strengthening
the program of another, St. Joseph High School, by allowing it to operate at
its student capacity for the first time. The move will also have the effect of
integrating the student population of St. Pius X High School. The faculty of
St. Pius has been integrated for four years now. DYouvilles
closing, however, was caused by the inability of the Grey Nuns to continue to
staff the academy with the same number of qualified sisters, and is, therefore,
indicative of the grave problems facing Catholic education.
A decrease in the number of teaching sisters caused by death,
retirement, and defection, augmented by fewer girls entering the novitiate, has
made it impossible for most religious orders to fill all of the positions they
have contracted for. The result is an increasing use of lay teachers at
ever-increasing salaries, a combination of factors that is producing severe
financial strain on our own school system, as all others.
Each year sees fewer sisters in teaching and administrative
positions; each year the ratio of lay teachers to sisters grows. When we
consider that the teaching sister is, what has made the American parochial
system the amazing achievement it is, we realize the seriousness of the problem
caused by the decline in their numbers. This is the heart of the crisis, and it
is indeed a cause for concern.
Bad news, however, always gets more attention than good news. The
past year actually saw much happen that is reason for optimism. The Synod,
including the Lay and Sister Congress, that led up to it, enabled the
archdiocese to reexamine its whole educational program closely, and to chart a
broad outline that will serve as a foundation for further growth.
The Department of Catholic Education was reorganized into six
areas-elementary, secondary, religious education, Newman Apostolate, adult
education, and special education. Each area will eventually have its own
director. This will assure us that all phases of the Churchs educational
responsibility will be adequately staffed and financed.
Certainly the Synods recommendation for a much greater
diocesan effort in the field of catechetics will meet a great need. As a
smaller percentage of the children of the archdiocese receive parochial school
education each year, our responsibility for the religious instruction of
children attending public school becomes increasingly urgent. For too long a
time we have tried to provide catechetical instruction without adequate
financing or professional administration. In the future every effort will have
to be made to see that not only our children, but especially adults are given
sound religious instruction. The new Office of Religious Education, with its
full-time director, is the beginning of this new thrust.
The proposal to accredit schools by the year 1972 was approved not
only by the Synod but by both the education committees of the Sisters
Congress and by the Lay Congress. What the organization of the Office of
Religious Education will do for catechetical instruction in the archdiocese,
the move to accredit our schools by the Southern Association will do for our
parochial schools. Overcrowded classrooms, un-degreed teachers, and the lack of
library and other instructional facilities and equipment, can no longer be an
accepted as part of Catholic education. Whatever the future of our parochial
schools, they cannot be poor schools, or even mediocre schools. They musty be
excellent schools, and we must be willing to meet the rigorous standards of a
professional and independent accrediting agency.
Perhaps the most significant of all of the Synods proposals
was that insisting on the formation of an archdiocese and parish boards of
education. The laity must be involved in policymaking for our educational
programs. The decisions we will make in all the areas of education in these
difficult days must not be made by just part of the church. They must be made
by the whole Church. Boards of Education will enable clergy, religious and
laity together to study the problems that confront us, and to chart the courses
that our parochial schools, schools of religion, and other education
institutions will take in the immediate and distant future.
There were other sources of encouragement and signs of growth.
This past year saw our parochial schools and high schools register their
highest attendance ever, reaching to 8,395, 108 over last years total of
8,287. This was contrary to the national trend, which saw a fall-off of almost
5.6% in Catholic elementary school attendance. The appointment of a director of
secondary education, Father Jack Cotter, will give a strong boost to our
secondary program, and insure better coordination between it and our elementary
section.
In the field of the Newman Apostolate, the completion of the
beautiful and modern center at Athens, the purchase of a building for
Emorys center, and the purchase of property adjoining the house at
Georgia Tech for future growth are all indicative of the impetus being given to
this vital educational area.
Over $15,000 was received for library books and materials under
Title II programs. Part of this material will go to our central film strip
library, which was begun last year when over $19,000 was received. Several of
our schools also participated in the cultural programs made available under
Title III in the City of Atlanta schools.
If the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 can stand up
in the Supreme Court, when its opponents finally test it, this trend of
increased federal aid can be expected to continue in the years ahead. It will
be a major factor in the future of private schools, especially our parochial
schools.
In conclusion, I feel that although our financial problems are
severe, they are not desperate. The fact that all of our elementary schools are
filled to capacity reminds us that a majority of our lay people want Catholic
schools. All reports to the contrary, the demand for our schools is greater
than ever. The reaction of parents to the closing of Immaculate Conception
Schools and Drexel High School demonstrated that. Again the fact that
pre-registration was greater than ever for September 1967, despite substantial
increases in tuition rates throughout the Archdiocese, indicates that enough of
our parents are able and willing to meet the increased financial burden
required for complete religious education.
Yet, we must have the course to look at the situation of Catholic
education realistically. The great surge of building that characterized the
1950s has ceased. The four newest parishes of the archdiocese have not opened
parish schools and have no plans to do so. Two of the parishes have started out
with sisters heading their religious education programs in schools of religion,
on a full-time basis. This may be an indication of the future, it is too early
to tell.
One thing is certain, it is a time for retrenching, of
consolidating. We must make every effort to keep open the schools now
operating, and to shore them up financially by employing every means of
economy. At the same time we must improve their educational programs, so they
will be institutions worthy of them.
To keep and make better what schools we now have; to move into the
new areas when and where we can-that must be our program for the years
immediately ahead.
Rev. Daniel J. OConnor
Secretary for Education
Archdiocese of Atlanta
June 30, 1967 |